Janet Steffenhagen, Vancouver Sun
Parents and teachers praise the program, offered by half of B.C. schools last fall, but it’s not without its critics as it’s implemented at all public schools next month
The introduction of full-day kindergarten in half of B.C. elementary schools last year was a remarkable success, according to a new study, despite the fact the plan was hatched in a hurry and not everyone is convinced it was necessary.
“In my 40 years as an educator, I have not witnessed a major educational change so enthusiastically implemented by both teachers and administrators,” researcher Janet Mort, a former school superintendent, states in a report released today as the province prepares for the second phase of implementation, which will see full-day kindergarten offered in every public school in the province.
“In my opinion, the future just became brighter and more promising for the school system’s youngest learners and their school success.”
While some parents still question the need for full-day kindergarten and wonder if their youngsters are ready to spend five hours a day in a classroom, none of those who participated in Mort’s survey favoured a return to the half-day program after their children had experienced the full-day model.
Their concerns were mainly about the transition period – especially for children who had never attended preschool or daycare – and fatigue. Some of the 100 parents who completed the survey suggested the school year should begin with two or three days of kindergarten per week and build to five full days by the end of September.
Mort, who conducted her study for the B.C. Principals’ and Vice-Principals’ Association, worked with researchers who visited a dozen schools offering full-day kindergarten last year, observing classes and talking to teachers, administrators and principals.
She found teachers were also worried about the transition phase and fretted that some little ones would be exhausted before the day ended. In response, they organized rest times with music and quiet activities, or created a space where children could lie down if they were tired, she writes in Taking the Pulse: Full-Day K in British Columbia Year One.
While excited about the opportunities, teachers wondered how they would cope with as many as 22 children, especially since a number of them would have undiagnosed special needs, the report adds. “Some expressed concern about parents: how they are feeling, how to alleviate their worries, and how to help them see FDK as something other than daycare.”
But after the first two weeks, teachers and principals reported that more than 90 per cent of the children were coping well, and within two to three months, all had adjusted to the full-day program, which emphasizes play-based learning. Teachers call it “the gift of time” because they are no longer in a rush to move from activity to activity, Mort says.
Paul Kershaw, a professor at the University of B.C. who is involved with the Human Early Learning Partnership (HELP), had expected full-day kindergarten to be well received, but he was surprised by the enthusiasm.
“It’s wildly popular,” he said in an interview. “What I’m hearing across the province is really – nine times out of 10 – wildly enthusiastic.”
While Kershaw is pleased the government proceeded with its plan for full-day K despite financial restraints, he described it as only a small step in the right direction.
“The emergence of full-day kindergarten has a great deal of potential, but it certainly isn’t the precise sort of programming that the research coming out of HELP would be calling for.”
What’s needed, he said, is a lower student-teacher ratio and a complementary program with before-and after-school care. To get good results, the ratio should be closer to 10: 1, he added.
Full-day kindergarten was proposed by the Liberals in 2008 in a throne speech that also mused about the possibility of kindergarten for three and four-year-olds…
That left little time for preparation or professional development for teachers, said Mort, who is also a HELP researcher. It also prompted a mini construction boom as the government authorized $144 million in capital spending to build 140 new modular classrooms, plus additions, renovations and the conversion of 400 surplus classrooms into kindergarten rooms.
That, as well as $365 million in operating costs for kindergarten over three years, left Surrey mother Linda Stromberg shaking her head.
“There’s lots of money for all-day kindergarten, but we don’t have [sufficient] money for Grades 1-12,” she said. “It’s a shame the government didn’t address that issue before putting more pressures on the school system.”
Stromberg is a member of an ad hoc committee that includes the Surrey mayor and council, the Surrey Board of Trade and the Surrey Teachers’ Association and is pressing for more funding for overcrowded public schools. This year, 5,000 students will be educated in portable classrooms because there’s not enough space in their neighbourhood schools, the district says.
That should have taken priority, Stromberg suggested.
The Burnaby-based Kids First Parent Association of Canada, which favours parental care over daycare, accused the Liberals and HELP researchers of exaggerating the benefits of full-day kindergarten and not consulting parents adequately before launching the program.
“Some parents think this is a good idea … but for some kids – maybe most kids – it’s not a good thing,” said president H Ward, adding that some children are likely to be tired and sick more often.
But the teachers who volunteered for Mort’s study found most children benefited from the program.
Wendy deGroot, a veteran kindergarten teacher in Nanaimo, agreed with the report’s conclusion, saying her students were much further ahead in literacy development this year than in previous years. “I had way more readers than I’ve ever had,” she said in an interview this week.
But she also has concerns, noting in particular the lack of educational assistants to help teachers in the classroom and supervise these tiny children in the playground before school starts and during recess and lunch breaks. DeGroot said she will have 22 children this year, including various special needs – some identified, some not – but she’s only been promised 7.5 hours of support a week.
To give a simple example of the challenges, she asked in an email what a teacher who is working alone should do when a child is ill. “Do we send a four-year-old (one-third of my class started school at age four) to find the office by themselves or with another four-or five year-old? Or do we bring the whole class?”
Mort’s report notes similar concerns about inadequate support, especially with special-needs children. She recommends school districts work with StrongStart centres and community organizations to identify physical, social and emotional challenges and arrange support before the children enter kindergarten.
Jameel Aziz, president of the B.C. Principals’ and Vice-Principals’ Association, said Mort’s study will help “guide the creation and maintenance of the best possible play-based learning environment for our youngest students and help to improve student achievement in the years ahead.”