Child poverty is British Columbia's shame
Victoria Times Colonist
By Paul Willcocks
June 8, 2009

The good news is that fewer B.C. kids were living in poverty in 2007.

The bad news is that the "Best Place on Earth" has the highest child poverty rate in Canada, according to Statistics Canada.

Worse, perhaps, is the fact that despite six consecutive years of that dismal distinction, poor children -- children generally -- weren't mentioned much in the provincial election campaign.

That bothered Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, the legislature's representative for children and youth. Turpel-Lafond, the first representative appointed after Ted Hughes' damning report called for an advocate and watchdog for children and families, was hoping for more.

"I was quite disappointed with the fact that the situation for children was not a central issue," said Turpel-Lafond. It's not just child poverty, she noted. There are also the grim stats for aboriginal children, on indicators from health to education to their over-representation in government care, and a list of other issues.

Instead, Turpel-Lafond said the campaign seemed to focus on the leaders' personalities, with a nod to the economy and the environment as issues.

Based on her travels and contacts with British Columbians, Turpel-Lafond says the politicians are out of touch. The public cares about issues affecting children and expects non-partisan action.

That's what she's hoping for the new session. The representative reports to a legislative committee, which was supposed to be working for children and youth but too often bogged down in politics -- ….The need for effective action is greater now. Turpel-Lafond says the situation for children has deteriorated with the economy. Services like legal aid and family court are underfunded and demand is mounting.

But often, she says, the focus seems to be on managing the way the public views issues rather than actually tackling the problems.

There's another risk as government looks at spending cuts to reduce a deficit soaring far beyond the budgeted $495 million. The Ministry of Children and Families was to get a 1.8 per cent budget increase to cover this year and the next two. Not 1.8 per cent a year; that's the total increase over three years to cope with increasing caseloads and rising costs.

"The bottom line is when you cut services and programs there is one group affected more than anybody -- poor people," Turpel-Lafond says. "Poor kids get hurt."

Which leads back to child poverty. If you want to predict children's futures, don't look at IQ, where they were born, age of parents, gender, race or any other factors.

Look at family income. Poor kids start in a deep hole.

You can have an interesting debate about how to define poor or low income. Statistics Canada uses the low-income cutoff (LICO). If a family spends more than 70 per cent of its pre-tax income on shelter, food and clothing, it is low income.

On average, an urban Canadian family of four with a total pre-tax income of less than $40,000 is considered low income. That's two parents, working full-time at $10.25 an hour. Which sounds poor to me.

Across Canada, 9.5 per cent of children live in poverty. In B.C., 13 per cent of children do. Since 2001, B.C. has had a higher proportion of children living in poverty than any other province.

That was through, for the most part, pretty good times. As the economy worsens, more and more children fall into poverty.

Yet the provincial government has no plan specifically aimed at reducing child poverty. There are no targets or timelines or accountability measures.

Turpel-Lafond says there is nothing mysterious or magical about improving life for children in B.C. "We know what to do, we just aren't doing it."….