|  Better a hand up than a handoutTimes Colonist (Victoria)
 April 30, 2007
 Comment -- By: Jim Hackler, adjunct professor in sociology 
                    at University of Victoria
 EXCERPT
  The motivation to help others is complex. Some have argued 
                    that charity is degrading. It sends a message that we are 
                    better than someone else.  I don't wish to open this debate, but there is a difference 
                    between a handout and a hand up. As a society, it is clearly 
                    better to provide a hand up, to help people get into a position 
                    where they are contributing members of a society....  Governments can change handouts to programs that help people 
                    get ahead. They can deliver programs in a way that degrades 
                    people, or they can help people maintain their self-esteem. 
                   During the 19th century, most European countries treated 
                    the old and disabled as charity cases. Some existed in homes 
                    for the poor. In 1889, Prince Otto von Bismarck of Germany 
                    argued that those who could no longer work had a well-grounded 
                    claim to care from the state. Government action transformed 
                    charity into a social program....  Similarly, systematic social programs by nations have turned 
                    charitable deeds into the rights of citizens in a civilized 
                    society.  My education, my health care, my extensive use of libraries, 
                    and now my Canada Pension payments were not charitable gifts. 
                    Instead, they were a civilized society's intelligent investment 
                    in my potential. Such investments help the vast majority of 
                    us make useful contributions to society and feel that we belong. 
                   I am bothered by a governmental mentality, both at the federal 
                    and provincial level, that prefers a handout to a hand up; 
                    that is dominated by a market mentality. Let the profit motive 
                    dictate all decisions. Health care should pay for itself. 
                    Housing is a commercial matter.  The decision to cut support for day care fits this mentality. 
                    Most of the developed world knows that investing in families 
                    with young children is not a handout; it makes young families 
                    and their children better and more productive citizens. Prime 
                    Minister Stephen Harper thinks a handout of $100 a month will 
                    somehow create adequate day-care programs.  Harper and B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell, who could make a 
                    difference to those living on the edge, are content to let 
                    charity, food kitchens and emergency shelters keep marginal 
                    people alive, as long as they not be too visible.  |