Employers Alone Can't Solve Child Care Challenges
By Ana Ferrer and Lynda Gagne
Globe and Mail Update
[Ana Ferrer is professor of economics at the University
of Calgary. Lynda Gagne is professor of public administration
at the University of Victoria. Their study, The Use of Family
Friendly Workplace Practices in Canada, published by the Institute
for Research on Public Policy, can be downloaded here.]
EXCERPT
Increasing numbers of two-earner households, longer work
hours and complaints about more stress have generated a considerable
amount of talk about the balance between work and life.
In an attempt to do something about this issue and to attract
and retain skilled workers, many firms have started to introduce
a variety of "family friendly" work practices. Some examples
of these measures include workplace child care and/or elder
care, flexible hours, and alternative work arrangements.
The attempt by firms to help their employees is laudable.
However, we need to ask whether these benefits are being used
to resolve the work-family conflict, and whether they are
available to those who need it the most. These questions are
critical.
In a study for the Institute for Research on Public Policy
(IRPP), we investigated the factors that influence the use
of work-family practices. Central questions were whether or
not these benefits were being used to resolve the work-family
conflict and whether they were offered to those who need them.
The message that emerged from the data is that firms alone
cannot resolve the work-family conflict.
Why is that?
First, the provision of family benefits seems biased toward
workers who do not need them. While skilled workers may be
the workers who are most likely to be offered the benefits,
they are not always necessarily those who would benefit most.
Either because of technological constraints (the firm is too
small), or because the employees cannot afford to pay for
such care, high-quality workplace child care is often not
available to low-skill workers with young children.
Second, as currently offered, firm-provided benefits are
of scarce interest to workers in the solution of work-life
conflict. For instance, full-time workers with family responsibilities
do not tend to use flexible hours to deal with the problems
stemming from too few hours in a day.
In terms of what types of people make use of family-friendly
work practices, the research is less controversial: As a general
rule, individuals with families place a higher premium on
family-friendly working conditions in the workplace.
Women tend to take advantage of certain benefits disproportionately....
How might we go about fixing the mismatch that currently
exits between what is offered by firms and what is needed
by workers?
Governments should have a role to play in helping solve this
problem. Since some benefits are difficult to implement for
many firms because of technical and size constraints, governments
remain a player in the provision of solutions to the work-family
conflict. Public policy can assist through a variety of programs,
including funding extended parental leave and affordable care
arrangements...
|